Sunday 20 November 2016

Christmas has come early - what will the new year bring?

In the 3 months to Sept unemployment fell by 37,000 to a ten-year low. But 95% of the new jobs went to immigrants, mainly from the EU. I imagine companies are filling roles quickly while they can. And the economy is going well - but that growth is clearly being fueled by immigrant workers. Nevertheless it is going well. Consumers are behaving as if it was Christmas already: October sales were up 7.4% on October 2015. It was the best single month in over 14 years.

So was Project Fear wrong or is it just pain delayed? Well, in terms of immediate impacts, it was clearly wrong. Inflation surprisingly took a turn down, though most commentators think it could get uglier come January, driven by the exchange rate, when price fix deals run out I suppose. But the large retailers seem to have some appetite for finding ways of keeping prices in check. The figures for business investment, due next week, are not expected to be rosy (but then neither were most of the above stats).

I warned that the Brexit transition could be messy and lengthy. I said it "weighed heavily on me" in my decision on how to vote (21 June). And that it could "easily" take 5 years (23 June, the day of the vote - did I really only say 5 years?!) I am keeping fingers crossed that the gloomsters will prove to be wrong. But, despite normally being an optimist, I am not confident. The more upbeat end of the Leave lobby who crow at every decent stat don't seem to realise that this transition hasn't even started yet!

And that transition could be very problematic. Writing in The Times, Philip Collins noted that "the Leave campaign was recklessly cavalier about how easy leaving the EU was going to be. Disentangling Britain from a series of legal treaties is not one event but many. The EU has about 50 international trade agreements from which the UK benefits, all of which will now have to be begun again. It will be a mammoth task even to replicate these arrangements, let alone improve on them. Maybe one day Liam Fox will return triumphant from Bosnia-Herzegovina with a new deal. Next stop Costa Rica, Mauritius the week after."

And he went on to say "Dr Fox cannot even start until Britain’s relationship with the EU is settled. The laws that frame the markets for financial services, employment, restructuring and insolvency, data protection and intellectual property have all been painstakingly drafted in chambers of the EU. Pension law, competition, telecommunications and media are almost as complicated. There are some bills, such as the Equalities Act, in which some provisions refer to the EU and some do not. That’s not to mention clauses whose parentage and application is a matter of legal dispute. Somebody is going to have to go through all of it and say yes or no to every clause. Every change will be the subject of well-informed corporate and charity lobbying. It is going to be fabulously complicated. If the referendum question had only been “can you really be bothered?” we would have voted to remain. This negotiation can only be done badly in two years and it probably cannot be done at all."

I think this view is amazingly negative. I can't accept the view that we can't start to negotiate with other countries until our deal with the EU is done - who could possibly stop us getting deals ready to sign? Europe might threaten sanctions against countries they have a deal with who have the temerity to talk to us - try that with Trump! Anyway, it sounds like the Europeans are setting their stall out for a take it or leave it negotiation, forcing a 'hard Brexit'. Well, that makes our decisions easier as well as there being little point in Parliamentary debates on what the deal should look like! We are in a strong position to negotiate trade deals with most countries and so the idea that they will all be different seems ridiculous: a template deal will developed by doing the first deals. And we can read and our computers can copy and paste, so all that work drafting the EU deals is available for us to vet and cherry pick.

Collins concluded "there is an inescapable sense of nobody taking back control", which does seem the case. So he argued for a transitional step, in which we leave the EU and join the EEA while further negotiations proceed. I can see the logic I that, but it would leave us in a half-way house at the next election, with myriad options for untenable positions to come out of the next General Election.

All very messy indeed. However, if we want to have control of our borders, control over what trade deals we do and not to have judges outside our system of democracy over-ruling those inside it, then there is no alternative: we have to leave. I wanted all of the things on that list but I decided I didn't want the aggravation of getting there more. But that's the job Mrs May and her government have been given: the electorate made it's choice and she accepted it - and so do I.

Though I fear it may turn out like the Stevie Winwood song for Mrs May's negotiators:

"Sometimes I feel so uninspired
Sometimes I feel like giving up
Sometimes I feel so very tired
Sometimes I feel like I've had enough....
I don't know who's losing and I don't care who's winning
Hardship and trouble are following me"
(From Sometimes I Feel So Uninspired, the last track on Traffic's 1971 album Shootout At the Fantasy Factory. Great guitar in this bluesy song - very simple but very effective. You can hear it at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cu1slvK6oIk)

Economic stats: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/autumn-shoppers-provide-best-retail-sales-figures-in-14-years-zlnpvhx75

Philip Collins piece is at http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/how-may-can-break-free-from-brexit-muddle-x6l877x99

Europe's leaders to force Britain into 'hard Brexit' in The Guardian: http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/europe%e2%80%99s-leaders-to-force-britain-into-%e2%80%98hard-brexit%e2%80%99/ar-AAkvya7?ocid=spartandhp

4 comments:

  1. Phil you should have voted to leave I think based on what you have been saying since the referendum. It I get your drift correctly you are saying that you are by instinct anti-EU but you were well informed enough to realise that leaving the EU would be almost mission impossible.

    You know I am pro-EU but even though we voted the same way we really have quite opposing views. I don't accept the 'opinion poll' result of the referendum, in many ways because of the reasons you have put forward i.e. it will be virtually impossible for the UK to come out of this Brexit process in a better position that it would have been staying in the EU. I also happen to believe the EU, for all its frustrating issues, is actually a force for the common good, for peace and for some measure of fiscal stability. Yes I know the Euro is in a mess but look at the UK economy it is also in one hell of a mess. Can we seriously become independently stable fiscally on our own in a global economy? I have great doubts based on where we are and how we got here.

    I really do think that MP's need to sober up and look at the actual picture rather than comforting themselves with phrases like 'the people have spoken' etc. Yes the people gave an opinion and frankly no one independently looking at the view expressed (by a small minority of those who either had or took the opportunity to express a view) and the reality of actually making Brexit work would say do it!

    We need clear headed political leaders who are willing to stand and shout above the noise of the rabid right wing press and the crazed people of UKIP and the far Tory right. Trouble is we have not got any as even Farron is hedging his bets.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are right Tony, my heart was for Leave but I was chicken! I can see the merit in being in the EU but not in the euro, though the euro is still not a proper currency and I worry about the stability of European banks. I don't accept that our economy is in a mess compared with most European countries, nor do I accept that the 5th (or is it 6th) biggest economy in the world can't thrive independently. A big problem with the EU is the propensity of its leaders to kick the can down the road instead of fixing anything, especially but not just in financial matters. It is also relatively corrupt. The exit transition was my nightmare scenario. But my new super-nightmare scenario is that we get part way through a painful transition and, by some mechanism involving a parliamentary vote or 2nd referendum, try to get back in, either extending the pain if unsuccessful or - my least favoured option - we get back in but have no effective voice on anything as we'll never be trusted or listened to ever again. I've been on the wrong end of Franco-German carve-ups in business and they weren't good experiences. As a result I am very reluctant to buy anything with the Siemens name on it!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is joining the EEA really a viable halfway step? I'm not so sure. The spectre of a protracted attempt to leave followed by a facsimile attempt to rejoin scares me somewhat. Especially if we've attempted a halfway house solution in the mean time. Its an expansive debate and one that a yes/no referendum was incabable of considering adequately.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, Mike, it's not clear it's viable though supposedly more knowledgeable folk than us have suggested it. What few commentators seem to recognise at the moment (re single market, EEA etc) is that we can't join a club if they won't have us. A kind of Groucho Marx thing in reverse!

      Delete